Culture of Contact Sweet 16: The O'Hare Airport UFO

This podcast contains explicit content | Played: 1301 | Download | Duration: 01:05:39





Jeff Ritzmann & David Biedny take us inside the O'Hare Airport UFO case. There is so much more here than even I suspected that you kinda don't want to miss this one. And for the technophile in you, you'll learn exactly what happens during photo analysis.

Also, remember when last David Biedny was on the show? Remember how that started with an angry rant from Jeremy about Stan Friedman, Bill Morre, and the MJ-12 documents? Whelp, Vaeni finally hashes it out with Stan tonight.

All that, plus Jeremy gets depressed on this the sweet 16th episode!

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this entry.
Comments

  • 11/28/2007 12:38 AM Daniel Brenton wrote:
    Jeremy --

    A good ride, as usual.

    So, why did you redact Jeff Ritzmann's face in the photo you used for the interview?

    Is it really true that his face must remain unidentified on the grounds of national security?

    Is it true that Jeff must remain an Unidentified Facial Object?????

    And why, pray tell, are no you longer the prince? Are you actually DEFERRING TO DAVID BIEDNY?

    Inquiring minds not only want, but DEMAND to know.

    (Dammit Jeremy, I've been listening to your show too much.)
    Reply to this
    1. 11/28/2007 8:59 AM Jeremy Vaeni wrote:
      It is a well-known fact that Jeff Ritzmann is an Unidentified Facial Object. He wasn't redacted, that's his actual face. You've just insulted the entire Ritzmann bloodline.

      As for me, I like to think of myself as the Artist Formerly Known As Prince. If Biedny wants my scraps, let the dog have his day. Actually I don't know what any of that means...What do you mean by "prince?"

      Thank you for listening and remember: There's no such thing as listening too much and Googling, your name isn't lame it's healthy.

      Reply to this
      1. 11/28/2007 11:14 AM Daniel Brenton wrote:
        Jeremy --

        In the last few seconds of the podcast your "little ethereal kid voice" says "Jeremy's no longer depressed." When I first heard it, I THOUGHT it said "Jeremy's no longer the prince." I thought this was some vague reference to Biedny "unseating" you from the troublemaker throne or something like that.

        I listened more closely and ... oops. I stand corrected.

        (Despite rumors to the contrary, I am not deaf.)

        (What?)

        As to the Ritzmann family line, I apologize deeply, and I will now erase myself.

        So Jeremy, when ar
        Reply to this
        1. 12/1/2007 10:30 AM Will wrote:
          I thought Jeremy said he no longer liked chintz, and that he was giving us a bit of background on his home decorating changes. I'm also not into those chintzy English flowered couches and chairs with the doilies. Seems vaguely unAmerican to me. Would John Wayne sit on such a chair? I think not!!
          Reply to this
        2. 12/1/2007 10:51 AM Will wrote:
          Daniel, are you still there? You stopped in midsentence, so I feared you received a nocturnal visit from 2 "insurance salesmen". An alternative theory (from my granddaughter just now) is that you are a multiple personality programmed by the NWO, and you just switched into your pirate's persona ("Arrrrr, me matey!")
          Reply to this
    2. 11/28/2007 12:56 PM Jeff Ritzmann wrote:
      LMAO...it's a simple case of having a lot of enemies in the UFO field (some who've threatened me and my family with physical violence). Thats what happens when you get into the practice of routinely exposing hoaxers and frauds. I just made the choice years ago not to have my face on the net for my own peace of mind...maybe it's dumb, but it's just been my practice. Nothing so incredibly interesting or mysterious.
      Reply to this
      1. 11/28/2007 2:41 PM Daniel Brenton wrote:
        Jeff --

        I understand, and I respect that.

        Too late for me -- I let my face out of the bag and I've got it ALL OVER the place.

        (Threats of physical violence ... this is what I have to look forward to?)

        I'd thank you for sharing that explanation, but I erased myself already.

        (Why is there white-out on my monitor?)

        Daniel
        Reply to this
      2. 12/1/2007 10:27 AM Will wrote:
        Jeff,

        Do what I do! Take a picture of some great looking guy that usually comes in a cheap picture frame from Walmart, then just let people assume it is you. Never, of course, say so, but just let that face represent you. So far the owner of that face (who may be a line backer for the Vikings or may be part of a chorus line in a gay dance revue) has never complained. If someone asks how a 55 year old can look so young, I just respond that it must be a positive side effect of being an abductee, e.g., they give me a dose of sheep embryo. Oil of Olay (interveniously) and special "mojo" that keeps me looking like an airbrushed photo. Joan Rivers understands.
        Reply to this
    3. 12/1/2007 10:57 AM Will wrote:
      Daniel,

      Seeking material for next year's TALL TALES context, methinks? I can see it now...you on stage "And my doorbell rang, and this alien abductee was standing there, asking if he could borrow a glass of element 115. In the distance, I could see a disabled UFO with some little geeks that looked like rejects from Willie Wonka's Chocolate Factory trying to get a tire jack situated under the dang thing..."
      Reply to this
  • 11/29/2007 5:14 PM Alfred Lehmberg wrote:
    A rose between two thorns?

    alienview@roadrunner.com
    > www.AlienView.net
    >> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
    >>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com
    Reply to this
    1. 11/29/2007 9:49 PM Jeremy Vaeni wrote:
      Still shilling for the Trouble-Maker award? I'm telling you, I'm making an acceptance speech either way. Either way, Lehmberg!

      Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.